Classical liberalism is often credited with ushering in the Enlightenment in Europe, a period of profound transformation spanning the late 17th to early 18th century. This era reshaped European politics, science, and philosophy, emphasizing the pursuit of knowledge, the decentralization of power, and the establishment of rational thought as a guiding principle.
As a result, traditional hierarchical power structures rooted in divine authority began to crumble, replaced by a new order where reason and empirical knowledge reigned supreme. Enlightenment ideals spread across the globe through trade, colonization, and conquest, profoundly shaping modern society. Many of our fundamental beliefs—such as the rights to life, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness—trace their origins to this intellectual revolution. Before then, the lives of ordinary people were largely dictated by feudal and religious systems.
But progress was not without cost. The journey to the present was paved with suffering, sacrifice, and struggle. Even so, it is undeniable that millions today live better, freer lives than their ancestors.
Yet, despite these advancements, Enlightenment ideals face mounting threats. On one side, we see the resurgence of pre-Enlightenment fundamentalist ideologies. On the other, a growing rejection of rationalism itself—where personal happiness or ideological purity is deemed justification enough to dismiss reasoned discourse altogether.
This tension is evident in contemporary debates, where contradictions abound. For instance, some pro-life advocates in the U.S. also support capital punishment. Meanwhile, certain groups championing diverse gender identities may simultaneously deny others the right to question or debate these identities. These inconsistencies underscore a broader problem: public discourse has devolved into tribalism, where people cling to simplified narratives rather than engage with the complexity of real issues.
In an era where everyone believes themselves an expert, nuance is often sacrificed for soundbites. But a society cannot function—let alone thrive—if its members refuse to engage in deep, rational inquiry. Reactionary statements do not solve problems; they entrench divisions.
To break this cycle, we must prioritize understanding before forming opinions. Perhaps the most responsible response to today’s climate is:
“I’m not sure. Let me take the time to better understand the issue, and I’ll get back to you when I do.”
And to that, I’d add:“In the meantime, let’s not say or do anything rash.”